User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
Languages | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
Userbox | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Search user languages |
RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hog Farm | 63 | 0 | 5 | 100 | Open | 02:47, 22 December 2024 | 6 days, 10 hours | no | report |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Ngbeam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- SuperbAlien (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Fathoms Below (talk) 15:59, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- RubberJackal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Highly disruptive SPA. The editor won't stop edit warring (which they have been doing since May) on the same three articles, while pushing their own WP:OR and not attempting to achieve consensus first. Skitash (talk) 15:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Fathoms Below (talk) 15:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2404:C0:1C30:0:0:0:6FC:AC76 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Nearly all edits involve changing places in Hong Kong to Malaysian places. Good day—RetroCosmos talk 16:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- 86.84.200.125 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Continued disruption after 31hr block. Accusing others of harassment for countering and correctly reporting/blocking this (and their other) IPs. Zinnober9 (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- TheLoraxSucks (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "sucks" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:50, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Brendan UTTP THDT is back (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "(\b)(is|are) ?back(\b)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Usually when a username contains "is back" it's a sockpuppeteer trying to be obvious -- DQB (owner / report) 01:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- GLOCKed. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:55, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Imitden (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: (ltd|pty). Violating string: lmltden" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 02:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Noousername111 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Niki Eh 40 YouTube (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See user page Devchar (talk) 03:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- I think the name was brought here as it advertises their YouTube channel. 331dot (talk) 09:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yep. Devchar (talk) 09:59, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- My interpretation of Wikipedia:ISU is that the username itself is ok but the user’s edits are likely to be promotional. Sort of like Fred Smith Blogger promotes their blogging or “Jack Jones CEO of Widgets Inc.”. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 15:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- I think the name was brought here as it advertises their YouTube channel. 331dot (talk) 09:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: I am requesting protection for 10 articles: 2010 Little League World Series through 2019 Little League World Series, inclusive.
There has been, and continues to be (as recently as today), intermittent but persistent long-term vandalism by an anonymous editor who uses various IP addresses. This person (or perhaps bot) continues to demonstrate a clear determination to corrupt the information in these articles. Most edits to these articles over the past year have been vandalism and reverts thereof. As these articles are about events that happened 5+ years ago, few to no future legitimate changes are expected. Requesting page protection for an indefinite amount of time. Dmoore5556 (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I clicked through all of these articles, and I see three total recent incidents of disruption among them. On the other hand, 2013 Little League World Series demonstrates why it's a bad idea to just lock off an historical event article. The event hasn't changed, but the world has. There's zero active disruption, just a couple of ip vandals in the last few months. BusterD (talk) 13:44, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbcom: India Pakistan articles. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 01:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Heyaaaaalol, contrary to the very similarly named WP:ARBPIA, the WP:ARBIPA area has no automatic extended-confirmed protection. There has been some disruptive editing in the history of this article, but no recent incident. Is there a specific reason for requesting this today? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There is a high level of IP vandalism occurring. The season’s grand finale has not yet concluded, but the winner and runner-up statuses are being deliberately altered. IP addresses are misleading information about the winners and runner ups.
Despite repeated attempts to undo the changes, persistent disruptive edits from IP addresses continue. I had raised this request yesterday but did not properly convey the extent of the problem caused by those edits. MySlack1222 (talk) 03:13, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:18, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass amounts of vandalism from unregistered users, following Hunter's Heisman trophy victory. Bulldawg (talk) 07:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2a02:2378:1000::/38 (talk · contribs) blocked by zzuuzz. If vandalism resumes, the article will be protected. Favonian (talk) 12:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism did resume. Favonian (talk) 14:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBECR. Skitash (talk) 14:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. As he is the head of the government in Bangladesh, this article is at risk of adding poorly sourced and biased info, so extended confirmed protection will prevent that. At least 1 year of protection will be good enough for now. Thanks. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 14:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. Multiple reverts made by IP 37.155.40.206 Mr.User200 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Several editions by IPs, which has been reverted by several users. [1] [2] [3] [4] HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last week. Xexerss (talk) 14:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because i believe that the metaverse is now less associated with crypto and the blockchain - especially after the rise of spatial computing. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for broader contribution from legitimate editors (especially IPs like me). Otherwise, if no cryptospam is expected, remove protection completely. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Decrease to "Registered account" often times it presumably make difficult for other WP:Wikipedian for instance In broader understanding the protection layer is unconditionally kept such high layer which doesn't fit after portably analysing the critics and marginally isolates its abbreviations within few hand and such consensual topic for a long period remain unchangeable applies for every WP:GSCASTE Pages 2409:40D6:109F:6A5F:FC1D:E520:AF8D:1E22 (talk) 11:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also theirs an sensible point which i forgot tell before anyway if someone to equate any topic imbalance WP:Topic he will await for such long lasting time which dosent make any decisive preservation for wikipedia open prophecy Just like i devastated on Talk:Jats for underlying discussion 2409:40D6:109F:6A5F:FC1D:E520:AF8D:1E22 (talk) 11:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hopefully i am not responsible for such nuisance its an telecom company which was already fulfilled by Jio telecoms which was partially blocked by User :Spicyas rfpp allegiance of complainers But its not an right way to blame me 2409:40D6:109F:6A5F:FC1D:E520:AF8D:1E22 (talk) 11:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – You've already submitted an edit request to Talk:Jats and should await its outcome. Favonian (talk) 12:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
This, I think, is the first time I've made a suggestion. Hopefully, I'm doing this correctly.
The lateral fricative voiced retroflex, as an example, has an IPA representation of ɖɭ˔ according to its Wikipedia page, but the IPA Pulmonic table and other tables use the Unicode representation in the table and any font I have found just doesn't handle that character,
Would it be better to use the IPA representation which I think many fonts handle since the table has 'IPA' in its title and its link points to the Wikipedia page with both representations? The linked article each cell in the table states that the representation the IPA version and that the Unicode character is implied from that.
I'd be happy to make a list of each table and cell where this occurs if that is necessary and you think these will be worthwhile changes. BLWBebopKid (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Kwamikagami as they are likely to have some insight to these issues. For me personally, I'm not sure. I happen to have fonts installed that handle the extIPA symbols, but I'm in the stark minority there. Remsense ‥ 论 01:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- ExtIPA is IPA. It's just a specialized subset. For example, extIPA can be used in the 'Illustrations of the IPA' published in JIPA.
- The issue is one of font support. The letters in question date to 2015, though they weren't added to Unicode until 2021. There are websites that list fonts that support various characters. These are supported by the SIL fonts, which are the best free IPA fonts available. If you don't have a good font installed, you're not going to be able to view IPA correctly anyway. That's why we have the IPA notice in articles, that you may need to install an IPA font to view the article properly. — kwami (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
1 protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |
15 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
---|
Account creator[edit] |
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I have created 400+ well-sourced articles on military, history, literature, politics, and academia, including recent BLPs. I believe i meet the criteria for autopatrolled rights. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Hi, I am re-requesting AWB perms. It was last denied because I had shown zero need for it but this time, I think I do have a reason. I had recently created Niagara (electoral district) and Middlesex North from a (redirect) to a Disambiguation page, and it has links. I would like to use AWB to update the links, and make it point to the right pages. I'm thinking there could be more "redirect-to-disambigaution" pages that would need updating links. Crafterstar (talk) 19:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to have AWB permission to do simple maintenance edits, like fixing typos or fixing links to disambiguation pages, more easily. Milo8505 (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights To improve the references for the page Flint water crisis. Emannnt (talk) 23:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: Been contributing for wikipedia. Confirming my account will motivate me to contribute more to this space. UMAGPR (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Reason for Request: I am requesting reinstatement of Extended Confirmed Rights after their removal by User:ScottishFinnishRadish for concerns related to "gaming EC through adding a machine translation of Fondation Maeght and Rueil-Malmaison in many small edits without attribution." He asked me to "make at least a few hundred edits" to regain it. I understand the importance of maintaining trust and adhering to Wikipedia’s policies, and I’ve since reflected on how to better contribute responsibly. Since the removal, I have added attribution to the concerned articles. I have made over 300 referenced contributions, focusing on adding reliable sources to improve verifiability, expanding content in alignment with Wikipedia’s standards, and enhancing article quality. I believe my recent contributions demonstrate constructive and policy-compliant editing. Examples of Recent Contributions: Water metering, Smart meter, and Gas meter, which are in my area of expertise. Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2024 (UTC) Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:15, 14 December 2024 (UTC) Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
This is my alternative account that I will use in public WiFi connections. Would like to edit ECP and semi-protected pages on this account, if possible. Thanks in advance! quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 19:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for file mover |
---|
File mover[edit]
Vulcan would like to be able to rename files and to help others in doing so. Already have similar role in Commons. Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Hi! I'd love to help out with the backlog. I have around ~40 AfD !votes, and I'm usually one of the first votes and always use strong guideline-backed reasoning. I've only had 1 AfD in the "red" cell of AfD Stats, that was a bio of a person from a non-English speaking country, and I tried to find sources in my WP:BEFORE, but nothing come up, and then another user more familiar with that country was able to dig something up so I withdrew (I don't think it should count as a black mark against me). I've also reviewed a lot of AfC submissions (a good amount of them sadly don't show in the AfC tool as they were later deleted, but there's still a decent chunk in there), and I almost always provide personalized advice backed with good reasoning when declining. You can find my CSD log here (n. 10, 100% success): User:MolecularPilot/CSD_Log, and I've also created 5 articles (see my user page), 4 of which are B class. Thanks for your time! :) MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 05:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to help contribute reduce the large backlog of unreviewed new pages. I've been an active AFC reviewer for a while. I've contributed to and created dozens of articles that are still live to date. ANUwrites 06:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
After I was granted the right some weeks ago, I have been reviewing new articles and since it expires in 6 days, I would like to request for an extension Tesleemah (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
I'm short of 3,000 edits requirement (currently at 2,400). I request page-moving rights as I'm encountering problems when reviewing new pages. Specifically, I face issues leaving redirects to (bad) pages I move to the draft space. Page-moving rights would help prevent redirects from being flagged for speedy deletion. ANUwrites 13:29, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I monitor recent edits to combat vandalism and improve articles, I also act on drafts, I have a good knowledge of Wikipedia rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
This permission will help me in combating vandalism. I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes, always warning users when necessary, assuming good faith, and taking full responsibility for all my edits. I also do crosswiki patrolling and recently joined the SWMT. — Jet Pilot (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I had been actively patrolling RC in 2023 but paused for a long time since I was too busy. I plan to resume soon and would like rollback rights to make it easier. Note from 07:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC): I had just been informed that RedWarn can be used on a school computer, so it's very likely that I will be using it. xRozuRozu • teacups 23:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been reverting vandalism by undoing edits, warning users, and monitoring several pages to keep them protected. Rollback rights would make my efforts faster and more efficient. I am familiar with WP:VANDAL. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 07:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been reverting vandalism since I created my account. Although it appears I am a new user, I also have experience editing Wikipedia and reverting vandalism as an IP for many years (which I will not be disclosing due to security concerns). The rollback right will help me revert vandalism faster, which is why I am requesting it. PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
I am finally starting to have a WP:CLUE, though I still deserve a good whack to the face with some WP:TROUT more often than I would like. While redwarn/UV is nice, it is not very fast to load diffs in the browser the way that I do at the moment (it is surprisingly resource intensive), and I think Huggle would help quite a bit along with reducing mistakes made as diffs would be clearer with less lag and more efficient resource usage. I have made mistakes, and will continue to make mistakes, but I find myself leaving more and more diffs untouched now that I realize more often when I don't have a WP:CLUE. Any advice is welcome, and advice on if I should still be using RedWarn or if there is some reason I should switch to UV would be welcome as well. 【💬】 04:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Being able to mass-rollback would've come in handy the last few days when dealing with cleaning up after an editor who had made a mess with adding copyvio images across a large number of articles (on multiple occasions). It was suggested that I requesting the rights for handling it easier in future. RachelTensions (talk) 05:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I'm quite active in the Recent Changes, and having the rollback feature would make reverting vandalism easier and quicker. jolielover♥talk 07:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
I'm revert vandalism again, to use AntiVandal and Ultraviolet. after Fastily retirement. I'm have more 200 reverts last 4 months, and I'm meet all requirements. declined requests: Thanks. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 08:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC) |
Immediate requests
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 76 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 24 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Articles for deletion | 482 |
Templates for deletion | 94 |
Categories for deletion | 87 |
Wikipedia files for discussion | 47 |
All redirects for discussion | 261 |
Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 14 |
Possible copyright violations | 12 |
All articles proposed for deletion | 294 |
All files proposed for deletion | 39 |
Unsorted AfD debates | 1 |
All files with the same name on Commons | 28 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Orphaned non-free use | 327 |
Unknown copyright status | 52 |
Unknown source | 74 |
No non-free use rationale | 2 |
Replaceable non-free use images | 14 |
Disputed non-free use images | 30 |
Page protection
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Protected | 10 |
Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,237 |
Fully protected user and user talk pages | 440 |
Protected against vandalism | 4 |
Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
Semi-protected | 2,346 |
Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]
General cleanup | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
---|---|---|
All pages needing cleanup | 34,118 | 0.49 |
All articles needing rewrite | 6,008 | 0.09 |
All articles needing expert attention | 1,330 | 0.02 |
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 40,008 | 0.58 |
Reference problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All pages needing factual verification | 11,141 | 0.16 |
All articles with unsourced statements | 535,382 | 7.73 |
All articles lacking sources | 71,504 | 1.03 |
All unreferenced BLPs | 10 | 0 |
All articles needing additional references | 474,777 | 6.86 |
All articles needing references cleanup | 4,618 | 0.07 |
All articles lacking in-text citations | 105,490 | 1.52 |
All articles with dead external links | 315,150 | 4.55 |
Image cleanup problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
Wikipedia files lacking a description | 138 | - |
Wikipedia files with unknown source | 19 | - |
Other problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All articles to be merged | 1,094 | 0.02 |
All articles to be split | 816 | 0.01 |
Unsorted Stubs | 0 | - |
Stub categories | 19,272 | - |
All uncategorized pages | 684 | 0.01 |
All orphaned articles | 52,911 | 0.76 |
All articles needing copy edit | 2,421 | 0.03 |
All articles with style issues | 19,586 | 0.28 |
All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,761 | 0.04 |
All articles that may contain original research | 16,495 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Requested moves | 453 |
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,336 |
All accuracy disputes | 15,755 |
Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
Articles with invalid ISSNs | 5 |
All articles to be expanded | 66,007 |
Special pages
[edit]Maintenance reports | Information |
---|---|
Broken redirects | |
Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
Long pages | |
New pages | New page patrol |
New pages feed | Page curation |
Protected pages | Protection policy |
Short pages | |
Uncategorized | Categorization |
Uncategorized cats | |
Uncategorized templates | |
Unused categories | |
Unused files (images) | |
Unused templates | |
Without interwiki links | |
Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]Misc
[edit]Delete | Keep | Neutral | Oppose | Support | Note | Template |
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. |