Talk:Goh Chok Tong

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Goh Chok Tong article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Singapore High‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

This article is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/goh-chok-tong-biography-standing-tall-book-14018792. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 15:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goh's tenure

@Seloloving, does Wikipedia dictates that sources must use the word as said in the sources? Because I'm pretty sure that's not something that's followed throughout the website. If you don't disagree with the word "benchwarmer", what word should be used instead? MordukhovichAleakin (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MordukhovichAleakin: I have perused all three articles listed, and none of the articles list him as "benchwarmer" for the Lee family. Even if the phrase is used, is there a more update-to-date source on his legacy that reflects his premiership, and not just after he assumed the position? We judge a position's rule based on their legacy after their rule, not their appointments at the time.

As seen on Lee Kuan Yew, his rule was characterized as "authoritarian", which I had previously added as it's a commonly used phrase on his rule. Seloloving (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - we don't do original research. We merely repeat what is said in reliable sources. If you want to use the term, it must be widely used to have been describe his rule and not just a fringe idea. Seloloving (talk) 18:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But these sources strongly hinted that Goh's was just a intermediary leader between LKY and LHL, especially the one whereby it talks about LHL getting cancer back in the 90s and how it might affect the succession. MordukhovichAleakin (talk) 18:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's still not a phrase used to describe his rule regardless. That would be WP:SYNTH synthesizing of sources to say something it did not. We don't make individual conclusions; it has to be widely said. Seloloving (talk) 18:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ESM title

Hello @Sgweirdo: Both of us have been reverting each other on the issue of the ESM title over the last few months. I feel we should probably discuss our respective reasons and perhaps involve other editors in this.

ESM is just an honorary post granted to Goh Chok Tong, very much similar to Minister Mentor to Lee Kuan Yew. Even though it's not a cabinet title, I have seen no indication that it's an honorific prefix. For example, source rarely add His Excellency and The Honourable when referring to individuals. You do not see this in ST, CNA, or any news media articles.

But they do attach the title of one's position such as Prime Minister/Finance Minister/Leader of the Opposition. This makes Emeritus Senior Minister just like any government position. No other article adds the current position to the honorific prefix field. Seloloving (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]